Category Archives: Team Sport
Updates on Team Sport
EDITOR: SPORT AND NATURAL HISTORY
Bloomsbury Publishing is looking for an experienced Editor to work across two very special lists in our London office.
Our world-leading Natural History list includes the highly regarded Christopher Helm Field Guides, a publishing partnership with the RSPB and titles on mammals, plants and trees. Our fantastic Sports list features high-quality writing on a wide variety of sports – from football and cricket to cycling and horseracing – and includes the famous Wisden imprint.
The role involves managing a number of full-colour and mono books through the editorial process from manuscript delivery and cover design through to publication, and requires working with authors, agents, freelancers, suppliers, illustrators, designers and in-house colleagues.
- Establishing good relationships with authors and agents
- Maintaining schedules for projects and taking titles through to publication
- Briefing and managing freelancers, undertaking copy-editing or proofreading in-house as required
- Liaising with authors, designers and proofreaders, collating comments and ensuring final files are ready for press on budget and on schedule
- Writing Advance Information sheets, briefing jackets and writing copy
- Working with the Rights Department to gather materials for foreign editions
- Preparing sample spreads and blads for use at book fairs, sales conferences
- Attending industry events.
Skills, knowledge, experience
- 18 months’ – 2 years’ editorial experience in illustrated book publishing
- Meticulous attention to detail
- Excellent proofreading and copy-editing skills
- Ability to write strong sales copy and blurbs
- Ability to prioritise and use own initiative, juggling several projects at one time
- Solid time-management skills to cope with competing deadlines as well as working across two departments
- Experience of working on photo-shoots desirable
- Basic knowledge of InDesign, Photoshop and Illustrator useful.
- Interest in sports and natural history a distinct advantage.
To apply, please send a CV, covering letter, current salary details and notice period to Sally Coleman, Human Resources Manager: email@example.com.
The closing date for this role is Monday 26th August 2013.
Guest post by Anna MacDiarmid, Specialist Editorial Intern
With Wimbledon now over, and Britain’s Andy Murray declared the winner of the coveted golden trophy, I wanted to look back to the very beginning, and relive the events that occurred on Court 1 on the 24th July.
Two weeks ago I finally got my day at Wimbledon, day one of The Championship on Court 1, and what a day it was.
The weather on the morning was not great and rain is always a possibility in the British climate, even when the sun is shining. So with sun cream, umbrella, blanket and picnic packed we headed off to Wimbledon.
After familiarizing ourselves with the club and most importantly getting our free voucher for strawberries and cream (finally, a benefit to being an HSBC customer) we made our way to our seats.
First on court was Victoria Azarenka vs. Maria Koehler. This was the match I was looking forward to least – Azarenka’s war cry starts to grate on most people after a while. There were some good points in the women’s game, but Azarenka dominated from the start, and her opponent did not put up much of a fight. However, this match did have some drama. Part way through the second set Azarenka let out an almighty scream and the crowd gave a collective gasp of shock. Azarenka was down, one slightly skewed turn and she twisted her knee. While she did go onto win the match, she was limping around the court. Her opponent should have used that to her advantage and sent her running, but she didn’t. The next day Azarenka pulled out; her competition was at an end.
Next on court was a match that I was very excited about, Rafael Nadal vs. Steve Darcis. Nadal is one of tennis’ greats and I was looking forward to seeing him play. Everyone expected him to wipe the floor with Darcis – I for one had never heard of his opponent. I was looking forward to seeing Nadal’s trademark power dominating the match from the baseline.
The tennis was fantastic from the start. As Darcis took the lead in the first set, everyone was incredulous; we were fully expecting Nadal to win in straight sets. Credit to both players, Nadal was not playing poorly at all – admittedly nowhere near his best, but you do not expect that in the first round of a tournament. Darcis was just playing better, he was getting the crucial points and he was playing as though he had nothing to loose. Okay, we thought, Nadal has lost the first set. That’s nothing. He has come back from far worse situations.
I found myself cheering on Darcis, the pluckiness and the style with which he was wearing down Nadal was just too good to not roar in delight at. When he took the second set, the crowd was in a state of disbelief. But still, Nadal has come back from 2 sets down many a time. No one was putting him out of the tournament until match point was won! But Darcis kept going, he was unstoppable; where many unseeded players might crumble under the pressure of serving out a match against a player such as Nadal, Darcis did not flinch. When the final point was played, only then did the crowd accept Nadal’s loss, and they went wild. I did feel sorry for Nadal, he looked very forlorn as he walked off the court to face a pounding from the press about his injury and tennis future. Darcis of course was jumping for joy, and rightly so; he had pulled off the biggest upset of the tournament.
Next up on court was former Wimbledon champion Lleyton Hewitt vs. 10th seed Stanilas Wawrinka. This was expected to be THE match of the day. Hewitt’s career has been plagued by injury, but he still has so much grit and determination left in him. He is a joy to watch, and after reaching the semi-final at Queen’s the previous week, he was definitely on top form. Wawrinka is another fabulous player, with one of the best single-handed backhands on the tour.
After the epic match we had just been treated to, I honestly felt exhausted, and I think the crowd felt the same. It was as though the energy had been sapped out of the stadium, and while the next two players were rushed on, I think the crowd was only half paying attention for the first thirty minutes. Hewitt was having absolutely none of that; always a crowd pleaser, he was revving up his audience. He had his own little group of Australian fans dressed up and ready with rehearsed chants to egg their hero on. Hewitt loved it.
Wawrinka was the favorite to win this match, as the highest seed, but that meant nothing to a crowd who had just watched Nadal get knocked out by ‘a nobody’. Hewitt is very far from ‘a nobody’, so it could swing either way. From the beginning of the match Wawrinka didn’t seem to be there. He was making many unforced errors and his famous backhand was failing to live up to expectations. Hewitt of course took advantage of this and battered down his opponent. By the end of the first set the crowd was in full swing, and I can say the majority were definitely supporting the old Wimbledon hero. It was majestic to watch, Wawrinka upped his game a lot in the 2nd and 3rd set, but it was just not enough. Hewitt was being carried along by the crowd, and loving every second of it. When he won I was left feeling all warm and bubbly inside. The BBC website ended its Wimbledon commentary with a quote I thought perfectly described the feeling in the stands: ‘As the sun sets on the first day of The Championships, an old Wimbledon flame burns bright’. As I left, my vision was clouded with idealism – I could see him going all the way.
Two days later Hewitt’s dream was over. That meant that all 6 players we had seen that day were now out. A small superstitious part of me worried that we had jinxed the players. But really it just goes to show that nothing in tennis, or sport, can be taken for granted. This year has been the year of shock exits, with Federer going out in the second round and Serena Williams in the fourth. They were preceded by an array of injury drop-outs from some of the best players, including Tsonga and Cilic. These top players know that they cannot take anything for granted so they take care of their bodies and they will all be back next year, stronger than ever, I am sure.
So this year we celebrate two brand new Wimbledon winners, Marion Bartoli and Andy Murray; let us hope they both go on to win many more titles.
For 3 weeks of the year, every year, I become obsessed. The blinkers are on and all I can think about is the Tour de France. It truly is one of the greatest of tests of sporting endurance – of true grit and determination. This year, the 100th running of the Tour, the riders will cover a staggering 3,404 kilometres with 7 flat stages, 5 hilly, and 6 mountain stages, including an unprecedented double ascent of the merciless Alpe D’Huez.
But I’m not alone in my admiration of this great race, Team Sport at Bloomsbury are all keen cycling fans. And for this reason, we’ve set up a Fantasy Cycling league, that we’d like to invite you to join. (It’s like Fantasy Football – but better!)
All you need to do is pick your dream team at fantasy.road.cc, join our league Bloomsbury Sport – Cycling, and see whether you can take on the fantasy cycling genius of Bloomsbury Sport’s: Maglia Charlo, L’Equipe Kirsty, Nick la Bomba and Allez Coley.
Do you think you can beat Bloomsbury Sport at Fantasy Cycling?
Need some help with your team choices? Look no further than Bloomsbury Sport’s Top Tips for the Tour…
Ones to watch:
- Chris ‘the Froominator’ Froome has been in stellar form this season, taking victories at the Tour of Oman, Criterium International, Tour de Romandie and Criterium du Dauphine. He’ll be looking to emulate his teammate Sir Brad’s yellow jersey victory last year to become the second Briton to win Le Tour.
- Alberto Contador, Froome’s ‘biggest threat’, is a two-time winner of the Tour de France.
- Vicenzo Nibali won the Maglia Rosa in the Giro d’Italia – could he make this a double? A feat no one has achieved since 1998.
- Andy Schleck is making his return to la Grande Boucle following a pelvis fracture in 2012,which prevented him from racing. Good form at the Tour de Suisse means we shouldn’t underestimate him.
- Mark Cavendish, the Manx Missile, will be targeting his first yellow jersey in the Corsican stages, bt his main aim will beto win back the green jersey from…
- Peter Sagan, the 23-year-old sprinting star, claimed three stage wins and the green jersey in 2012. Can he do it again?
The Tour de France gets underway in Corsica on Saturday 29 June. We’ll be ramping up our coverage in the days before then and during Le Tour so be sure to check back regularly for all the latest news and competitions from Bloomsbury Sport.
Or follow us on Twitter: @BloomsburySport
Bloomsbury are proud to announce that we have three books on the shortlist for the British Sport Book Awards. The three books to be shortlisted are:
Best Illustrated Book
Coppi by Herbie Sykes
Best New Writer
Sit Down and Cheer by Martin Kelner
Best Cricket Book
We’ll Get ’Em in Sequins by Max Davidson
The winner for each category will be announced on Tuesday 21st May 2013 – fingers crossed!
I have been reading a good book on the evolution of human nature and culture that I’ll not provide a link to here as Bloomsbury don’t publish it and I’m that petty. One piece of social science research it unearths troubles me, and it’s something it seems has long been taken for granted when psychologists discuss the supporters of team sports. We are all desperately, unthinkingly and arbitrarily tribal. Which is to say, we are concurrently members of as many tribes as we can find connections to: from people, say, of the same religion as us to those that like the same guitar-strewn ne’er-do-wells or brand of cat litter. And once in a tribe, we will bias favouritism towards anyone we feel that tribal link to. Uh-huh, me too! I like GrittyKitty! You’re all right, you!
When it comes to supporting a sports team, the biases of tribalism explode. Various chin-strokers suggest that the mini-wars of sports teams, facing each other in packs and defending a home structure, fit so easily with our Paleolithic wiring that we experience the same fervour and bias as if it was in actuality our small band of spear-wielding nudists taking on the appalling cannibals from across the river (i.e. Millwall). This they say explains the popularity of round and oval ball sports, and even prim-white-jumpered cricket.
It’s all in good fun of course, so why bother to give pause? No one is actually getting a spear through her netball bib after all. Perhaps, but a couple of things still stick in my craw. The delusion that the accomplishments/failures of the team I support directly transfer their glory/shame to me creates a worryingly arbitrary pendulum to which to fix my emotional life. No, actually, this I’m OK with, glory being otherwise hard to come by. It is odd though, the unreality of my link to the team, and the fact I would NEVER consider shifting my allegiance. Jerry Seinfeld sums it up well:
Loyalty to any one sports team is pretty hard to justify. Because the players are always changing, the team can move to another city, you’re actually rooting for the clothes when you get right down to it. You know what I mean, you are standing and cheering and yelling for your clothes to beat the clothes from another city. Fans will be so in love with a player but if he goes to another team, they boo him. This is the same human being in a different shirt, they hate him now. Boo! Different shirt!! Boo. [intro to the Seinfeld episode ‘The Label Maker’]
If there proves to be any truth to the preposterous rumour that Liverpool’s goalkeeper Pepe Reina might be transferred to Manchester United I would respond like that I think. Boo! Different shirt!! A traitor would’ve crossed a line that I personally could never even consider pretending to sniff like cocaine à la Robbie Fowler. Bringing me to the other worry: the unthinking approval-bias towards the behaviour of fellow tribespeople (fans, players) and its corollary, the unthinking bias against the behaviour of the enemy. … I have just deleted a paragraph or two as I dove knees-first into a few of the illustrative sticking points between Liverpool FC and Manchester’s second best club. I delete as I want to move past the bias – as level-headed and good-natured as I imagine my bias to be. There are at least two sides to any story, and since I would want people to be open-minded toward ‘our’ side when it contradicts public or media opinion, I should be prepared to be just as open-minded in the reverse situation. I’m not quite there yet.
This blog arises as we are soon to publish a book on Manchester United’s history: Standing on the Shoulders of Giants. I was sick at the thought of it and made sure that all related work was pushed onto my long-suffering colleague Sarah. And have since been hiding my arms under my desk. But no, give them fair credit, the club’s rise is a powerful story, and their achievements continue to break records we should all be impressed by. They have had many excellent players, and also David Beckham. Ho ho. No, he too was more than the shrill stripper naysayers mock. His boots had a genius for spatial geometry, and his best free kicks will be long remembered.
I will say no more lest I chew through my own tongue, but this is a start. Biases should remain on the field, giving us our vicarious jollies through the length of the ritualised skirmish. Go our colourfully dressed little war-party, sack and plunder! Beyond that, let calm and sense be the things of greatest value.